Socialization Exercise: Count How Many Times You Interrupt Someone
Comments: 4 - Date: January 17th, 2008 - By: Schwern - Categories: Exercise
This tip comes by way of Andy Lester. He pointed out a blog about the book “Brazen Careerist“. From what I’ve read so far, it is most brazenly careerist in a sort of greasy saleman sort of way, but Andy found one bit particularly useful. It’s a social exercise.
Count how many times you interrupt someone.
If you ask a sales guy why they are good at sales, they always say they are good listeners. And then, in fact, they display those skills during the flight.
I am not a good listener. I spend the flight hearing myself interrupt. Constantly.
It sounds like a moment that is bad for my emotional intelligence work, but really, it’s good. It’s good because it allows me to go to the next step, which is asking myself why I am so reluctant to wait to hear what someone has to say. That’s where I am now - asking myself that.
People say I’m a good listener. Sometimes I am, sometimes I’m not. I’ve caught myself constantly interrupting someone, especially in a heated technical conversation. Even when I realize what I’m doing I’m strangely compelled to continue. Part of it is being caught up in the heat of the argument (note, not discussion, argument) and wanting to pick at any point of weakness. Part is that engineer’s mentality to want to correct people before they waste any more time doing it the wrong way, even to the point of talking about it.
It is a source of prejudice. Whether you mean it or not, cutting people off before they’ve completed their thought means you’ve heard all you need to hear on the subject. You’ve already formed your opinion. The rest does not matter. I’m not saying it is prejudiced, but by cutting things off early you don’t hear the whole story and fill in the rest with your own prior experiences.
Sometimes I interrupt because if I don’t blurt out what I have to say I’ll forget it in the rush of nine other things I want to say. If I try to hold it all in my head I can’t listen as well. To clear things up, I’ll take the simple expedient of writing down little reminder notes — on a scrap of paper or even on my hand — and then come back to it later. When the current thread runs down I will “pop the conversation stack” back to some interesting point that didn’t get explored before.
When it happens I realize I’m heating up the conversation, pressuring the other person to talk faster, respond faster and both of us to think less and react more which leads to emotional reactions rather than considered opinion. Once you’re at that point, nobody’s going to change their mind. You’re arguing.
As I’ve mentioned a few times on this blog, the biggest problem is realizing what the problem is. Becoming consciously aware of your ingrained behaviors. Then you can think about them and do something about it.
Count your interruptions. Maybe, when you get the urge to interrupt, count to 5 and see if it’s still there. Give your brain a chance to engage before your mouth does.




Comment by Sean Whitney - 17 January 2008 @ 6:22
I find I interrupt because I have a point to add, clarify or correct and if I don’t interrupt now it will be lost to me when the other person finishes their thought.
This suggests to me
a) that I can’t keep more than about one thought in my head at one time
b) that I am unable to concentrate on the big picture of what they are saying and I’m lost looking at the trees
Sean
Comment by gabrielle - 17 January 2008 @ 6:40
Yet more reasons I prefer email over talking: I don’t have to worry about interrupting (or being interrupted), and I can take notes without anybody making fun of me for it. I’m glad to hear you do that (take notes) too.
by cutting things off early you don’t hear the whole story and fill in the rest with your own prior experiences.
If they’re one of those people that solves problems by working their way through them out loud interrupting them has a tendency to completely derail their problem-solving, and it can be hard for them to get back on the original track. That’s another road to emotional reactions leading to an argument. You can get some interesting insights into their thought patterns if you listen, which can be a fun game to play while you’re practising not interrupting.
Comment by Alice - 21 January 2008 @ 8:05
On “popping the conversation stack”…
I like this way of referring to it. I’ve always called this style of conversation “tabbed browsing”, and it seems to be key to a lot of friendships I’ve had - I multi-track way too much in my default settings to not do this at least to some degree. I also have a (perhaps unfortunate) tendency to interrupt someone, state a relevant point, and then repeat the last thing they said in (hopefully) enough detail that they can pick it back up again. This can work really well with people who’re fairly flexible in their communication styles, but others will never be comfortable in those conversations.
Comment by Ask Bjørn Hansen - 21 January 2008 @ 13:27
I’ve had good luck using SubEthaEdit for design work when I’m working with people not within whiteboard distance. More so than IRC or IM (and much more than the phone), then it’s completely natural to asynchronously stop or pause for five or thirty minutes to think.
And it allows for free unlimited interruptions, except they are not. I can write questions to whatever you are writing as you are writing it. The brain is relatively able to read and write at the same time, so you can decide to answer now or when you’re done writing your part.
- ask
Leave a comment